Review



human transferrin elisa kit  (Multi Sciences (Lianke) Biotech Co Ltd)


Bioz Verified Symbol Multi Sciences (Lianke) Biotech Co Ltd is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Multi Sciences (Lianke) Biotech Co Ltd manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Multi Sciences (Lianke) Biotech Co Ltd human transferrin elisa kit
    The impact of ligand conjugation on cell uptake of mEVs‐Tf. (a) Schematic illustration of the principle for evaluating the correlation between ligand conjugation and cell uptake. (b) Confocal fluorescence microscopy analysis of the cell uptake of DiD‐labelled blank mEVs and the <t>transferrin</t> conjugated counterparts in the presence or absence of 50 mM free transferrin, respectively. HepG2 cells were incubated with DiD‐labelled (red) mEV‐Tf for 12 h, and stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue) for cell nuclei imaging. (c) Lysosome colocalization analysis of DiD‐labelled blank mEVs and mEVs‐Tf engineered by different methods. HepG2 cells were incubated with DiD‐labelled (red) mEV samples for 24 h, and stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue) and LysoTracker (green) for cell nuclei and lysosome imaging, respectively. (d) Semi‐quantitative analysis of the colocalization degree between mEVs and lysosomes using the Manders' colocalization coefficients M1 and M2. (e) Representative dot‐plots between particle size and ligand number of the mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 engineered by lipid modification (panel‐i), protein modification (panel‐ii) and membrane insertion (panel‐iii), respectively. The transferrin concentration was 50 µM for all three samples. (f), (g) Percentage of Tf‐CF488 positive particles (f) and ligand density (g) of the mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 engineered by different methods with increasing input concentrations of Tf‐CF488. (h) FCM analysis of the impact of ligand density on the cell uptake degree of the DiD‐labelled mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 engineered by lipid modification (panel‐i), protein modification (panel‐ii) and membrane insertion (panel‐iii), respectively. (i,j) The relationship between cell fluorescence intensity (FL‐DiD) and input concentration of Tf‐CF488 (i), and ligand density (j) for DiD‐labelled mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 engineered by different methods.
    Human Transferrin Elisa Kit, supplied by Multi Sciences (Lianke) Biotech Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 2 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+transferrin+elisa+kit/Human+Transferrin+Receptor%2FTFR+ELISA+Kit/pmc12519427-365-12-16
    Average 94 stars, based on 2 article reviews
    human transferrin elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    94/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Unravelling Ligand Conjugation Performance in Extracellular Vesicles: A Quantitative Assessment of Lipid, Protein, and Membrane Modifications"

    Article Title: Unravelling Ligand Conjugation Performance in Extracellular Vesicles: A Quantitative Assessment of Lipid, Protein, and Membrane Modifications

    Journal: Journal of Extracellular Vesicles

    doi: 10.1002/jev2.70174

    The impact of ligand conjugation on cell uptake of mEVs‐Tf. (a) Schematic illustration of the principle for evaluating the correlation between ligand conjugation and cell uptake. (b) Confocal fluorescence microscopy analysis of the cell uptake of DiD‐labelled blank mEVs and the transferrin conjugated counterparts in the presence or absence of 50 mM free transferrin, respectively. HepG2 cells were incubated with DiD‐labelled (red) mEV‐Tf for 12 h, and stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue) for cell nuclei imaging. (c) Lysosome colocalization analysis of DiD‐labelled blank mEVs and mEVs‐Tf engineered by different methods. HepG2 cells were incubated with DiD‐labelled (red) mEV samples for 24 h, and stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue) and LysoTracker (green) for cell nuclei and lysosome imaging, respectively. (d) Semi‐quantitative analysis of the colocalization degree between mEVs and lysosomes using the Manders' colocalization coefficients M1 and M2. (e) Representative dot‐plots between particle size and ligand number of the mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 engineered by lipid modification (panel‐i), protein modification (panel‐ii) and membrane insertion (panel‐iii), respectively. The transferrin concentration was 50 µM for all three samples. (f), (g) Percentage of Tf‐CF488 positive particles (f) and ligand density (g) of the mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 engineered by different methods with increasing input concentrations of Tf‐CF488. (h) FCM analysis of the impact of ligand density on the cell uptake degree of the DiD‐labelled mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 engineered by lipid modification (panel‐i), protein modification (panel‐ii) and membrane insertion (panel‐iii), respectively. (i,j) The relationship between cell fluorescence intensity (FL‐DiD) and input concentration of Tf‐CF488 (i), and ligand density (j) for DiD‐labelled mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 engineered by different methods.
    Figure Legend Snippet: The impact of ligand conjugation on cell uptake of mEVs‐Tf. (a) Schematic illustration of the principle for evaluating the correlation between ligand conjugation and cell uptake. (b) Confocal fluorescence microscopy analysis of the cell uptake of DiD‐labelled blank mEVs and the transferrin conjugated counterparts in the presence or absence of 50 mM free transferrin, respectively. HepG2 cells were incubated with DiD‐labelled (red) mEV‐Tf for 12 h, and stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue) for cell nuclei imaging. (c) Lysosome colocalization analysis of DiD‐labelled blank mEVs and mEVs‐Tf engineered by different methods. HepG2 cells were incubated with DiD‐labelled (red) mEV samples for 24 h, and stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue) and LysoTracker (green) for cell nuclei and lysosome imaging, respectively. (d) Semi‐quantitative analysis of the colocalization degree between mEVs and lysosomes using the Manders' colocalization coefficients M1 and M2. (e) Representative dot‐plots between particle size and ligand number of the mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 engineered by lipid modification (panel‐i), protein modification (panel‐ii) and membrane insertion (panel‐iii), respectively. The transferrin concentration was 50 µM for all three samples. (f), (g) Percentage of Tf‐CF488 positive particles (f) and ligand density (g) of the mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 engineered by different methods with increasing input concentrations of Tf‐CF488. (h) FCM analysis of the impact of ligand density on the cell uptake degree of the DiD‐labelled mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 engineered by lipid modification (panel‐i), protein modification (panel‐ii) and membrane insertion (panel‐iii), respectively. (i,j) The relationship between cell fluorescence intensity (FL‐DiD) and input concentration of Tf‐CF488 (i), and ligand density (j) for DiD‐labelled mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 engineered by different methods.

    Techniques Used: Conjugation Assay, Fluorescence, Microscopy, Incubation, Staining, Imaging, Modification, Membrane, Concentration Assay

    Impact of ligand conjugation on MFGE8 accessibility and surface‐ligand distribution homogeneity of transferrin. (a) Schematic illustration of ligand conjugation effects on the cell binding behaviour of mEVs‐Tf. (b) FCM analysis of the MFGE8‐mediated cell uptake of mEVs. HepG2 cells were treated with DiD‐labelled blank mEVs with (blue) or without (red) labelling against MFGE8 antibodies. (c) Relationships between particle size and the immunofluorescence intensity of MFGE8 for blank mEVs (panel‐i) and the transferrin‐conjugated mEVs engineered by lipid modification (panel‐ii), protein modification (panel‐iii) and membrane insertion (panel‐iv), respectively. (d) The percentage of MFGE8‐positive particles (left y‐axis) and the immunofluorescence intensity (right y‐axis) of the mEV samples. (e) Correlation between the fluorescence intensity of CF488 versus CF594 for individual mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 (panel‐i) and mEVs‐Tf‐CF488&Tf‐CF594 engineered by lipid modification (panel‐ii), protein modification (panel‐iii) and membrane insertion (panel‐iv), respectively. (f) The percentage of CF594‐positive particles (left y‐axis) and the relative fluorescence intensity of CF594 to CF488 (right y‐axis) of the mEV samples. Note: In these experiments, the concentrations of sPLD, TCEP and DSPE‐PEG‐MAL for lipid‐, protein‐ and membrane‐based ligand conjugation were 10 U/mL, 2 and 1.25 mM, respectively.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Impact of ligand conjugation on MFGE8 accessibility and surface‐ligand distribution homogeneity of transferrin. (a) Schematic illustration of ligand conjugation effects on the cell binding behaviour of mEVs‐Tf. (b) FCM analysis of the MFGE8‐mediated cell uptake of mEVs. HepG2 cells were treated with DiD‐labelled blank mEVs with (blue) or without (red) labelling against MFGE8 antibodies. (c) Relationships between particle size and the immunofluorescence intensity of MFGE8 for blank mEVs (panel‐i) and the transferrin‐conjugated mEVs engineered by lipid modification (panel‐ii), protein modification (panel‐iii) and membrane insertion (panel‐iv), respectively. (d) The percentage of MFGE8‐positive particles (left y‐axis) and the immunofluorescence intensity (right y‐axis) of the mEV samples. (e) Correlation between the fluorescence intensity of CF488 versus CF594 for individual mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 (panel‐i) and mEVs‐Tf‐CF488&Tf‐CF594 engineered by lipid modification (panel‐ii), protein modification (panel‐iii) and membrane insertion (panel‐iv), respectively. (f) The percentage of CF594‐positive particles (left y‐axis) and the relative fluorescence intensity of CF594 to CF488 (right y‐axis) of the mEV samples. Note: In these experiments, the concentrations of sPLD, TCEP and DSPE‐PEG‐MAL for lipid‐, protein‐ and membrane‐based ligand conjugation were 10 U/mL, 2 and 1.25 mM, respectively.

    Techniques Used: Conjugation Assay, Binding Assay, Immunofluorescence, Modification, Membrane, Fluorescence

    In vivo cancer targeting performance of ligand‐conjugated mEVs. (a) In vivo fluorescence images of the cancer‐bearing mice injected with DiD‐labelled blank mEVs, and mEVs‐Tf engineered by distinct methods at different time points. (b) Time‐dependent variation in radiant efficiency of the tumour site of the mice treated with various mEV formulations. (c) Ex vivo fluorescence images of tumours and other organs excised from the treated mice at 24 h post‐injection. (d) Radiant efficiency of the tumours and other organs based on the ex vivo fluorescence images. (e) Schematic illustration of the principle for characterizing the IgG and IgM adsorption on mEVs after serum incubation. (f), (g) Representative distributions and the bivariate dot‐plots of the particle size and the immunofluorescence intensity of IgG (f) and IgM (g) of the mouse serum‐incubated blank mEVs (panel‐i), and the transferrin‐conjugated counterparts engineered by lipid modification (panel‐ii), protein modification (panel‐iii) and membrane insertion (panel‐iv), respectively. (h)–(j) Immunolabelling ratio (h), immunofluorescence intensity (i), and particle size (j) of the mouse serum‐incubated mEV samples. (k) The ELISA measurement of the accessible transferrin concentration of the mEV samples before and after serum incubation.
    Figure Legend Snippet: In vivo cancer targeting performance of ligand‐conjugated mEVs. (a) In vivo fluorescence images of the cancer‐bearing mice injected with DiD‐labelled blank mEVs, and mEVs‐Tf engineered by distinct methods at different time points. (b) Time‐dependent variation in radiant efficiency of the tumour site of the mice treated with various mEV formulations. (c) Ex vivo fluorescence images of tumours and other organs excised from the treated mice at 24 h post‐injection. (d) Radiant efficiency of the tumours and other organs based on the ex vivo fluorescence images. (e) Schematic illustration of the principle for characterizing the IgG and IgM adsorption on mEVs after serum incubation. (f), (g) Representative distributions and the bivariate dot‐plots of the particle size and the immunofluorescence intensity of IgG (f) and IgM (g) of the mouse serum‐incubated blank mEVs (panel‐i), and the transferrin‐conjugated counterparts engineered by lipid modification (panel‐ii), protein modification (panel‐iii) and membrane insertion (panel‐iv), respectively. (h)–(j) Immunolabelling ratio (h), immunofluorescence intensity (i), and particle size (j) of the mouse serum‐incubated mEV samples. (k) The ELISA measurement of the accessible transferrin concentration of the mEV samples before and after serum incubation.

    Techniques Used: In Vivo, Fluorescence, Injection, Ex Vivo, Adsorption, Incubation, Immunofluorescence, Modification, Membrane, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Concentration Assay

    Related Articles

    Concentration Assay:

    Article Title: Transferrin plays a central role in coagulation balance by interacting with clotting factors
    Article Snippet: The MS and MS/MS spectra were collected and processed using FlexControl, FlexAnalysis, and BioTools software (BrukerDaltonics, Germany). .. The concentration of transferrin in the plasma of CHD patients and healthy controls was determined using a human transferrin ELISA kit (EK12012-96T, Multi Sciences, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. .. TIBC in plasma of these CHD patients and healthy controls was determined by TIBC kit (ab239715, Abcam, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

    Article Title: Transferrin plays a central role in coagulation balance by interacting with clotting factors.
    Article Snippet: The MS and MS/MS spectra were collected and processed using FlexControl, FlexAnalysis, and BioTools software (BrukerDaltonics, Germany). .. Transferrin measurement in human plasma and tissue specimens The concentration of transferrin in the plasma of CHD patients and healthy controls was determined using a human transferrin ELISA kit (EK12012-96T, Multi Sciences, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. .. TIBC in plasma of these CHD patients and healthy controls was determined by TIBC kit (ab239715, Abcam, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

    Article Title: Unravelling Ligand Conjugation Performance in Extracellular Vesicles: A Quantitative Assessment of Lipid, Protein, and Membrane Modifications.
    Article Snippet: .. The concentration of accessible transferrin conjugated on mEVs was measured by a human transferrin ELISA kit (MultiSciences). ..

    Article Title: Unravelling Ligand Conjugation Performance in Extracellular Vesicles: A Quantitative Assessment of Lipid, Protein, and Membrane Modifications
    Article Snippet: .. The concentration of accessible transferrin conjugated on mEVs was measured by a human transferrin ELISA kit (MultiSciences). ..

    Clinical Proteomics:

    Article Title: Transferrin plays a central role in coagulation balance by interacting with clotting factors
    Article Snippet: The MS and MS/MS spectra were collected and processed using FlexControl, FlexAnalysis, and BioTools software (BrukerDaltonics, Germany). .. The concentration of transferrin in the plasma of CHD patients and healthy controls was determined using a human transferrin ELISA kit (EK12012-96T, Multi Sciences, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. .. TIBC in plasma of these CHD patients and healthy controls was determined by TIBC kit (ab239715, Abcam, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

    Article Title: Transferrin plays a central role in coagulation balance by interacting with clotting factors.
    Article Snippet: The MS and MS/MS spectra were collected and processed using FlexControl, FlexAnalysis, and BioTools software (BrukerDaltonics, Germany). .. Transferrin measurement in human plasma and tissue specimens The concentration of transferrin in the plasma of CHD patients and healthy controls was determined using a human transferrin ELISA kit (EK12012-96T, Multi Sciences, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. .. TIBC in plasma of these CHD patients and healthy controls was determined by TIBC kit (ab239715, Abcam, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

    Article Title: Iron-Deficiency and Estrogen Are Associated With Ischemic Stroke by Up-Regulating Transferrin to Induce Hypercoagulability.
    Article Snippet: .. Transferrin concentrations in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid were determined by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using a human transferrin ELISA kit (EK12012-96T, Multi Sciences, China) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. ..

    Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay:

    Article Title: Transferrin plays a central role in coagulation balance by interacting with clotting factors
    Article Snippet: The MS and MS/MS spectra were collected and processed using FlexControl, FlexAnalysis, and BioTools software (BrukerDaltonics, Germany). .. The concentration of transferrin in the plasma of CHD patients and healthy controls was determined using a human transferrin ELISA kit (EK12012-96T, Multi Sciences, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. .. TIBC in plasma of these CHD patients and healthy controls was determined by TIBC kit (ab239715, Abcam, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

    Article Title: Transferrin plays a central role in coagulation balance by interacting with clotting factors.
    Article Snippet: The MS and MS/MS spectra were collected and processed using FlexControl, FlexAnalysis, and BioTools software (BrukerDaltonics, Germany). .. Transferrin measurement in human plasma and tissue specimens The concentration of transferrin in the plasma of CHD patients and healthy controls was determined using a human transferrin ELISA kit (EK12012-96T, Multi Sciences, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. .. TIBC in plasma of these CHD patients and healthy controls was determined by TIBC kit (ab239715, Abcam, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

    Article Title: Iron-Deficiency and Estrogen Are Associated With Ischemic Stroke by Up-Regulating Transferrin to Induce Hypercoagulability.
    Article Snippet: .. Transferrin concentrations in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid were determined by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using a human transferrin ELISA kit (EK12012-96T, Multi Sciences, China) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. ..

    Article Title: Unravelling Ligand Conjugation Performance in Extracellular Vesicles: A Quantitative Assessment of Lipid, Protein, and Membrane Modifications.
    Article Snippet: .. The concentration of accessible transferrin conjugated on mEVs was measured by a human transferrin ELISA kit (MultiSciences). ..

    Article Title: Unravelling Ligand Conjugation Performance in Extracellular Vesicles: A Quantitative Assessment of Lipid, Protein, and Membrane Modifications
    Article Snippet: .. The concentration of accessible transferrin conjugated on mEVs was measured by a human transferrin ELISA kit (MultiSciences). ..



    Similar Products

    93
    Innovative Research Inc two site enzyme linked immunoassay test
    Two Site Enzyme Linked Immunoassay Test, supplied by Innovative Research Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+transferrin+elisa+kit/Human+Transferrin+ELISA+Kit/pm41226582-163-8-16
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    two site enzyme linked immunoassay test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Multi Sciences (Lianke) Biotech Co Ltd human transferrin elisa kit
    The impact of ligand conjugation on cell uptake of mEVs‐Tf. (a) Schematic illustration of the principle for evaluating the correlation between ligand conjugation and cell uptake. (b) Confocal fluorescence microscopy analysis of the cell uptake of DiD‐labelled blank mEVs and the <t>transferrin</t> conjugated counterparts in the presence or absence of 50 mM free transferrin, respectively. HepG2 cells were incubated with DiD‐labelled (red) mEV‐Tf for 12 h, and stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue) for cell nuclei imaging. (c) Lysosome colocalization analysis of DiD‐labelled blank mEVs and mEVs‐Tf engineered by different methods. HepG2 cells were incubated with DiD‐labelled (red) mEV samples for 24 h, and stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue) and LysoTracker (green) for cell nuclei and lysosome imaging, respectively. (d) Semi‐quantitative analysis of the colocalization degree between mEVs and lysosomes using the Manders' colocalization coefficients M1 and M2. (e) Representative dot‐plots between particle size and ligand number of the mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 engineered by lipid modification (panel‐i), protein modification (panel‐ii) and membrane insertion (panel‐iii), respectively. The transferrin concentration was 50 µM for all three samples. (f), (g) Percentage of Tf‐CF488 positive particles (f) and ligand density (g) of the mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 engineered by different methods with increasing input concentrations of Tf‐CF488. (h) FCM analysis of the impact of ligand density on the cell uptake degree of the DiD‐labelled mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 engineered by lipid modification (panel‐i), protein modification (panel‐ii) and membrane insertion (panel‐iii), respectively. (i,j) The relationship between cell fluorescence intensity (FL‐DiD) and input concentration of Tf‐CF488 (i), and ligand density (j) for DiD‐labelled mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 engineered by different methods.
    Human Transferrin Elisa Kit, supplied by Multi Sciences (Lianke) Biotech Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+transferrin+elisa+kit/Human+Transferrin+Receptor%2FTFR+ELISA+Kit/pmc12519427-365-12-16
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human transferrin elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Bethyl human transferrin elisa kit
    Figure 1. rhTF expression in transgenic rice calli. (A) Diagrammatic representation of the expression cassette for rhTF. Amy3D p: promoter of α- amylase 3D (GenBank Accession No. BAT05863 ); amy3D sp: signal peptide of α- amylase 3D ; human <t>transferrin</t> : ORF of human transferrin (GenBank Accession No. NM_001063 ), lacking the signal sequence; glutelinB-1 t: terminator of glutelinB-1 (GenBank Accession No. AY585231 ). (B) Immunoblot analysis using anti-hTF. T 0 calli were cultivated in N6D liquid medium without sucrose, and supernatants were collected on day 14. The samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-hTF, followed by a peroxidase-conjugated anti-goat secondary antibody. The red triangle indicates bands corresponding to the glycosylated form of hTF. Lane 1: glycosylated TF from human serum (standard); Lane 2: size marker; Lane 3: culture supernatant of WT (negative control); Lanes 4–12: culture supernatants from T 0 calli expressing rhTF.
    Human Transferrin Elisa Kit, supplied by Bethyl, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+transferrin+elisa+kit/Human+Transferrin+ELISA+Kit/pmc13170787-50-12-16
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human transferrin elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    98
    Thermo Fisher human transferrin receptor elisa kit
    Figure 1. rhTF expression in transgenic rice calli. (A) Diagrammatic representation of the expression cassette for rhTF. Amy3D p: promoter of α- amylase 3D (GenBank Accession No. BAT05863 ); amy3D sp: signal peptide of α- amylase 3D ; human <t>transferrin</t> : ORF of human transferrin (GenBank Accession No. NM_001063 ), lacking the signal sequence; glutelinB-1 t: terminator of glutelinB-1 (GenBank Accession No. AY585231 ). (B) Immunoblot analysis using anti-hTF. T 0 calli were cultivated in N6D liquid medium without sucrose, and supernatants were collected on day 14. The samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-hTF, followed by a peroxidase-conjugated anti-goat secondary antibody. The red triangle indicates bands corresponding to the glycosylated form of hTF. Lane 1: glycosylated TF from human serum (standard); Lane 2: size marker; Lane 3: culture supernatant of WT (negative control); Lanes 4–12: culture supernatants from T 0 calli expressing rhTF.
    Human Transferrin Receptor Elisa Kit, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+transferrin+elisa+kit/Transferrin/pm41544256-102-10-15
    Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human transferrin receptor elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    98/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Bethyl human transferrin elisa quantitation
    Figure 1. rhTF expression in transgenic rice calli. (A) Diagrammatic representation of the expression cassette for rhTF. Amy3D p: promoter of α- amylase 3D (GenBank Accession No. BAT05863 ); amy3D sp: signal peptide of α- amylase 3D ; human <t>transferrin</t> : ORF of human transferrin (GenBank Accession No. NM_001063 ), lacking the signal sequence; glutelinB-1 t: terminator of glutelinB-1 (GenBank Accession No. AY585231 ). (B) Immunoblot analysis using anti-hTF. T 0 calli were cultivated in N6D liquid medium without sucrose, and supernatants were collected on day 14. The samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-hTF, followed by a peroxidase-conjugated anti-goat secondary antibody. The red triangle indicates bands corresponding to the glycosylated form of hTF. Lane 1: glycosylated TF from human serum (standard); Lane 2: size marker; Lane 3: culture supernatant of WT (negative control); Lanes 4–12: culture supernatants from T 0 calli expressing rhTF.
    Human Transferrin Elisa Quantitation, supplied by Bethyl, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+transferrin+elisa+kit/Human+Transferrin+ELISA+Kit/pmc12707895-81-25-33
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human transferrin elisa quantitation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    e88  (Bethyl)
    93
    Bethyl e88
    Figure 1. rhTF expression in transgenic rice calli. (A) Diagrammatic representation of the expression cassette for rhTF. Amy3D p: promoter of α- amylase 3D (GenBank Accession No. BAT05863 ); amy3D sp: signal peptide of α- amylase 3D ; human <t>transferrin</t> : ORF of human transferrin (GenBank Accession No. NM_001063 ), lacking the signal sequence; glutelinB-1 t: terminator of glutelinB-1 (GenBank Accession No. AY585231 ). (B) Immunoblot analysis using anti-hTF. T 0 calli were cultivated in N6D liquid medium without sucrose, and supernatants were collected on day 14. The samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-hTF, followed by a peroxidase-conjugated anti-goat secondary antibody. The red triangle indicates bands corresponding to the glycosylated form of hTF. Lane 1: glycosylated TF from human serum (standard); Lane 2: size marker; Lane 3: culture supernatant of WT (negative control); Lanes 4–12: culture supernatants from T 0 calli expressing rhTF.
    E88, supplied by Bethyl, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+transferrin+elisa+kit/Human+Transferrin+ELISA+Kit/pmc12707895-81-30-33
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    e88 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Multi Sciences (Lianke) Biotech Co Ltd elisa kit
    A HSPA4 colocalizes <t>with</t> <t>transferrin</t> in cells. The expression of HSPA4 (green) and transferrin (TF; red) in SH-SY5Y cells was analyzed by immunofluorescence analysis, and DAPI (blue) was used to stain the nucleus. Scale bar = 5 μm. B Intracellular transferrin was increased by HSPA4. SH-SY5Y cells were transfected with the plasmid expressing Hspa4 . Twenty-four hours post-transfection, the cells were subjected to immunofluorescence analysis using an anti-transferrin antibody. DAPI was used to stain the nucleus. Scale bar = 50 μm. C Quantification of the relative fluorescence intensity of transferrin, as shown in ( B ). n = 5 biologically independent samples. D HSPA4 sequesters transferrin in SH-SY5Y cells. SH-SY5Y cells were transfected with a plasmid expressing Hspa4 . Twenty-four hours post-transfection, the cells and cell culture media were collected, and HSPA4 expression was analyzed by western blot. Actin (left panel) and Coomassie blue staining (right panel) were used as loading controls. E HSPA4 reduces extracellular transferrin. SH-SY5Y cells were transfected with a plasmid expressing Hspa4 . Twenty-four hours post-transfection, the cell culture media were collected, and transferrin was measured with an <t>ELISA</t> kit. n = 4 biologically independent samples. F HSPA4 decreases the level of intracellular Fe 2+ . SH-SY5Y cells were transfected with a plasmid expressing Hspa4 . Twenty-four hours post-transfection, the cells were harvested for analysis of Fe 2+ . n = 3 biologically independent samples. EV: empty vector; TF: transferrin. All data are presented as means ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by unpaired Student’s t -test.
    Elisa Kit, supplied by Multi Sciences (Lianke) Biotech Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+transferrin+elisa+kit/Human+Transferrin%2FTF+ELISA+Kit/pmc12511602-493-11-14
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    The impact of ligand conjugation on cell uptake of mEVs‐Tf. (a) Schematic illustration of the principle for evaluating the correlation between ligand conjugation and cell uptake. (b) Confocal fluorescence microscopy analysis of the cell uptake of DiD‐labelled blank mEVs and the transferrin conjugated counterparts in the presence or absence of 50 mM free transferrin, respectively. HepG2 cells were incubated with DiD‐labelled (red) mEV‐Tf for 12 h, and stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue) for cell nuclei imaging. (c) Lysosome colocalization analysis of DiD‐labelled blank mEVs and mEVs‐Tf engineered by different methods. HepG2 cells were incubated with DiD‐labelled (red) mEV samples for 24 h, and stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue) and LysoTracker (green) for cell nuclei and lysosome imaging, respectively. (d) Semi‐quantitative analysis of the colocalization degree between mEVs and lysosomes using the Manders' colocalization coefficients M1 and M2. (e) Representative dot‐plots between particle size and ligand number of the mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 engineered by lipid modification (panel‐i), protein modification (panel‐ii) and membrane insertion (panel‐iii), respectively. The transferrin concentration was 50 µM for all three samples. (f), (g) Percentage of Tf‐CF488 positive particles (f) and ligand density (g) of the mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 engineered by different methods with increasing input concentrations of Tf‐CF488. (h) FCM analysis of the impact of ligand density on the cell uptake degree of the DiD‐labelled mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 engineered by lipid modification (panel‐i), protein modification (panel‐ii) and membrane insertion (panel‐iii), respectively. (i,j) The relationship between cell fluorescence intensity (FL‐DiD) and input concentration of Tf‐CF488 (i), and ligand density (j) for DiD‐labelled mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 engineered by different methods.

    Journal: Journal of Extracellular Vesicles

    Article Title: Unravelling Ligand Conjugation Performance in Extracellular Vesicles: A Quantitative Assessment of Lipid, Protein, and Membrane Modifications

    doi: 10.1002/jev2.70174

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The impact of ligand conjugation on cell uptake of mEVs‐Tf. (a) Schematic illustration of the principle for evaluating the correlation between ligand conjugation and cell uptake. (b) Confocal fluorescence microscopy analysis of the cell uptake of DiD‐labelled blank mEVs and the transferrin conjugated counterparts in the presence or absence of 50 mM free transferrin, respectively. HepG2 cells were incubated with DiD‐labelled (red) mEV‐Tf for 12 h, and stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue) for cell nuclei imaging. (c) Lysosome colocalization analysis of DiD‐labelled blank mEVs and mEVs‐Tf engineered by different methods. HepG2 cells were incubated with DiD‐labelled (red) mEV samples for 24 h, and stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue) and LysoTracker (green) for cell nuclei and lysosome imaging, respectively. (d) Semi‐quantitative analysis of the colocalization degree between mEVs and lysosomes using the Manders' colocalization coefficients M1 and M2. (e) Representative dot‐plots between particle size and ligand number of the mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 engineered by lipid modification (panel‐i), protein modification (panel‐ii) and membrane insertion (panel‐iii), respectively. The transferrin concentration was 50 µM for all three samples. (f), (g) Percentage of Tf‐CF488 positive particles (f) and ligand density (g) of the mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 engineered by different methods with increasing input concentrations of Tf‐CF488. (h) FCM analysis of the impact of ligand density on the cell uptake degree of the DiD‐labelled mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 engineered by lipid modification (panel‐i), protein modification (panel‐ii) and membrane insertion (panel‐iii), respectively. (i,j) The relationship between cell fluorescence intensity (FL‐DiD) and input concentration of Tf‐CF488 (i), and ligand density (j) for DiD‐labelled mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 engineered by different methods.

    Article Snippet: The concentration of accessible transferrin conjugated on mEVs was measured by a human transferrin ELISA kit (MultiSciences).

    Techniques: Conjugation Assay, Fluorescence, Microscopy, Incubation, Staining, Imaging, Modification, Membrane, Concentration Assay

    Impact of ligand conjugation on MFGE8 accessibility and surface‐ligand distribution homogeneity of transferrin. (a) Schematic illustration of ligand conjugation effects on the cell binding behaviour of mEVs‐Tf. (b) FCM analysis of the MFGE8‐mediated cell uptake of mEVs. HepG2 cells were treated with DiD‐labelled blank mEVs with (blue) or without (red) labelling against MFGE8 antibodies. (c) Relationships between particle size and the immunofluorescence intensity of MFGE8 for blank mEVs (panel‐i) and the transferrin‐conjugated mEVs engineered by lipid modification (panel‐ii), protein modification (panel‐iii) and membrane insertion (panel‐iv), respectively. (d) The percentage of MFGE8‐positive particles (left y‐axis) and the immunofluorescence intensity (right y‐axis) of the mEV samples. (e) Correlation between the fluorescence intensity of CF488 versus CF594 for individual mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 (panel‐i) and mEVs‐Tf‐CF488&Tf‐CF594 engineered by lipid modification (panel‐ii), protein modification (panel‐iii) and membrane insertion (panel‐iv), respectively. (f) The percentage of CF594‐positive particles (left y‐axis) and the relative fluorescence intensity of CF594 to CF488 (right y‐axis) of the mEV samples. Note: In these experiments, the concentrations of sPLD, TCEP and DSPE‐PEG‐MAL for lipid‐, protein‐ and membrane‐based ligand conjugation were 10 U/mL, 2 and 1.25 mM, respectively.

    Journal: Journal of Extracellular Vesicles

    Article Title: Unravelling Ligand Conjugation Performance in Extracellular Vesicles: A Quantitative Assessment of Lipid, Protein, and Membrane Modifications

    doi: 10.1002/jev2.70174

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Impact of ligand conjugation on MFGE8 accessibility and surface‐ligand distribution homogeneity of transferrin. (a) Schematic illustration of ligand conjugation effects on the cell binding behaviour of mEVs‐Tf. (b) FCM analysis of the MFGE8‐mediated cell uptake of mEVs. HepG2 cells were treated with DiD‐labelled blank mEVs with (blue) or without (red) labelling against MFGE8 antibodies. (c) Relationships between particle size and the immunofluorescence intensity of MFGE8 for blank mEVs (panel‐i) and the transferrin‐conjugated mEVs engineered by lipid modification (panel‐ii), protein modification (panel‐iii) and membrane insertion (panel‐iv), respectively. (d) The percentage of MFGE8‐positive particles (left y‐axis) and the immunofluorescence intensity (right y‐axis) of the mEV samples. (e) Correlation between the fluorescence intensity of CF488 versus CF594 for individual mEVs‐Tf‐CF488 (panel‐i) and mEVs‐Tf‐CF488&Tf‐CF594 engineered by lipid modification (panel‐ii), protein modification (panel‐iii) and membrane insertion (panel‐iv), respectively. (f) The percentage of CF594‐positive particles (left y‐axis) and the relative fluorescence intensity of CF594 to CF488 (right y‐axis) of the mEV samples. Note: In these experiments, the concentrations of sPLD, TCEP and DSPE‐PEG‐MAL for lipid‐, protein‐ and membrane‐based ligand conjugation were 10 U/mL, 2 and 1.25 mM, respectively.

    Article Snippet: The concentration of accessible transferrin conjugated on mEVs was measured by a human transferrin ELISA kit (MultiSciences).

    Techniques: Conjugation Assay, Binding Assay, Immunofluorescence, Modification, Membrane, Fluorescence

    In vivo cancer targeting performance of ligand‐conjugated mEVs. (a) In vivo fluorescence images of the cancer‐bearing mice injected with DiD‐labelled blank mEVs, and mEVs‐Tf engineered by distinct methods at different time points. (b) Time‐dependent variation in radiant efficiency of the tumour site of the mice treated with various mEV formulations. (c) Ex vivo fluorescence images of tumours and other organs excised from the treated mice at 24 h post‐injection. (d) Radiant efficiency of the tumours and other organs based on the ex vivo fluorescence images. (e) Schematic illustration of the principle for characterizing the IgG and IgM adsorption on mEVs after serum incubation. (f), (g) Representative distributions and the bivariate dot‐plots of the particle size and the immunofluorescence intensity of IgG (f) and IgM (g) of the mouse serum‐incubated blank mEVs (panel‐i), and the transferrin‐conjugated counterparts engineered by lipid modification (panel‐ii), protein modification (panel‐iii) and membrane insertion (panel‐iv), respectively. (h)–(j) Immunolabelling ratio (h), immunofluorescence intensity (i), and particle size (j) of the mouse serum‐incubated mEV samples. (k) The ELISA measurement of the accessible transferrin concentration of the mEV samples before and after serum incubation.

    Journal: Journal of Extracellular Vesicles

    Article Title: Unravelling Ligand Conjugation Performance in Extracellular Vesicles: A Quantitative Assessment of Lipid, Protein, and Membrane Modifications

    doi: 10.1002/jev2.70174

    Figure Lengend Snippet: In vivo cancer targeting performance of ligand‐conjugated mEVs. (a) In vivo fluorescence images of the cancer‐bearing mice injected with DiD‐labelled blank mEVs, and mEVs‐Tf engineered by distinct methods at different time points. (b) Time‐dependent variation in radiant efficiency of the tumour site of the mice treated with various mEV formulations. (c) Ex vivo fluorescence images of tumours and other organs excised from the treated mice at 24 h post‐injection. (d) Radiant efficiency of the tumours and other organs based on the ex vivo fluorescence images. (e) Schematic illustration of the principle for characterizing the IgG and IgM adsorption on mEVs after serum incubation. (f), (g) Representative distributions and the bivariate dot‐plots of the particle size and the immunofluorescence intensity of IgG (f) and IgM (g) of the mouse serum‐incubated blank mEVs (panel‐i), and the transferrin‐conjugated counterparts engineered by lipid modification (panel‐ii), protein modification (panel‐iii) and membrane insertion (panel‐iv), respectively. (h)–(j) Immunolabelling ratio (h), immunofluorescence intensity (i), and particle size (j) of the mouse serum‐incubated mEV samples. (k) The ELISA measurement of the accessible transferrin concentration of the mEV samples before and after serum incubation.

    Article Snippet: The concentration of accessible transferrin conjugated on mEVs was measured by a human transferrin ELISA kit (MultiSciences).

    Techniques: In Vivo, Fluorescence, Injection, Ex Vivo, Adsorption, Incubation, Immunofluorescence, Modification, Membrane, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Concentration Assay

    Figure 1. rhTF expression in transgenic rice calli. (A) Diagrammatic representation of the expression cassette for rhTF. Amy3D p: promoter of α- amylase 3D (GenBank Accession No. BAT05863 ); amy3D sp: signal peptide of α- amylase 3D ; human transferrin : ORF of human transferrin (GenBank Accession No. NM_001063 ), lacking the signal sequence; glutelinB-1 t: terminator of glutelinB-1 (GenBank Accession No. AY585231 ). (B) Immunoblot analysis using anti-hTF. T 0 calli were cultivated in N6D liquid medium without sucrose, and supernatants were collected on day 14. The samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-hTF, followed by a peroxidase-conjugated anti-goat secondary antibody. The red triangle indicates bands corresponding to the glycosylated form of hTF. Lane 1: glycosylated TF from human serum (standard); Lane 2: size marker; Lane 3: culture supernatant of WT (negative control); Lanes 4–12: culture supernatants from T 0 calli expressing rhTF.

    Journal: Plant Biotechnology

    Article Title: Production of recombinant human transferrin using transgenic rice cell culture

    doi: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.25.1105b

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 1. rhTF expression in transgenic rice calli. (A) Diagrammatic representation of the expression cassette for rhTF. Amy3D p: promoter of α- amylase 3D (GenBank Accession No. BAT05863 ); amy3D sp: signal peptide of α- amylase 3D ; human transferrin : ORF of human transferrin (GenBank Accession No. NM_001063 ), lacking the signal sequence; glutelinB-1 t: terminator of glutelinB-1 (GenBank Accession No. AY585231 ). (B) Immunoblot analysis using anti-hTF. T 0 calli were cultivated in N6D liquid medium without sucrose, and supernatants were collected on day 14. The samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-hTF, followed by a peroxidase-conjugated anti-goat secondary antibody. The red triangle indicates bands corresponding to the glycosylated form of hTF. Lane 1: glycosylated TF from human serum (standard); Lane 2: size marker; Lane 3: culture supernatant of WT (negative control); Lanes 4–12: culture supernatants from T 0 calli expressing rhTF.

    Article Snippet: Quantification of rhTF was achieved by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using a Human Transferrin ELISA Kit (Bethyl Labs, Montgomery, TX) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

    Techniques: Expressing, Transgenic Assay, Sequencing, Western Blot, SDS Page, Marker, Negative Control

    A HSPA4 colocalizes with transferrin in cells. The expression of HSPA4 (green) and transferrin (TF; red) in SH-SY5Y cells was analyzed by immunofluorescence analysis, and DAPI (blue) was used to stain the nucleus. Scale bar = 5 μm. B Intracellular transferrin was increased by HSPA4. SH-SY5Y cells were transfected with the plasmid expressing Hspa4 . Twenty-four hours post-transfection, the cells were subjected to immunofluorescence analysis using an anti-transferrin antibody. DAPI was used to stain the nucleus. Scale bar = 50 μm. C Quantification of the relative fluorescence intensity of transferrin, as shown in ( B ). n = 5 biologically independent samples. D HSPA4 sequesters transferrin in SH-SY5Y cells. SH-SY5Y cells were transfected with a plasmid expressing Hspa4 . Twenty-four hours post-transfection, the cells and cell culture media were collected, and HSPA4 expression was analyzed by western blot. Actin (left panel) and Coomassie blue staining (right panel) were used as loading controls. E HSPA4 reduces extracellular transferrin. SH-SY5Y cells were transfected with a plasmid expressing Hspa4 . Twenty-four hours post-transfection, the cell culture media were collected, and transferrin was measured with an ELISA kit. n = 4 biologically independent samples. F HSPA4 decreases the level of intracellular Fe 2+ . SH-SY5Y cells were transfected with a plasmid expressing Hspa4 . Twenty-four hours post-transfection, the cells were harvested for analysis of Fe 2+ . n = 3 biologically independent samples. EV: empty vector; TF: transferrin. All data are presented as means ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by unpaired Student’s t -test.

    Journal: Communications Biology

    Article Title: HSPA4 restrains transferrin in dopaminergic neurons to attenuate ferroptosis in a Parkinson’s disease model

    doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-08854-7

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A HSPA4 colocalizes with transferrin in cells. The expression of HSPA4 (green) and transferrin (TF; red) in SH-SY5Y cells was analyzed by immunofluorescence analysis, and DAPI (blue) was used to stain the nucleus. Scale bar = 5 μm. B Intracellular transferrin was increased by HSPA4. SH-SY5Y cells were transfected with the plasmid expressing Hspa4 . Twenty-four hours post-transfection, the cells were subjected to immunofluorescence analysis using an anti-transferrin antibody. DAPI was used to stain the nucleus. Scale bar = 50 μm. C Quantification of the relative fluorescence intensity of transferrin, as shown in ( B ). n = 5 biologically independent samples. D HSPA4 sequesters transferrin in SH-SY5Y cells. SH-SY5Y cells were transfected with a plasmid expressing Hspa4 . Twenty-four hours post-transfection, the cells and cell culture media were collected, and HSPA4 expression was analyzed by western blot. Actin (left panel) and Coomassie blue staining (right panel) were used as loading controls. E HSPA4 reduces extracellular transferrin. SH-SY5Y cells were transfected with a plasmid expressing Hspa4 . Twenty-four hours post-transfection, the cell culture media were collected, and transferrin was measured with an ELISA kit. n = 4 biologically independent samples. F HSPA4 decreases the level of intracellular Fe 2+ . SH-SY5Y cells were transfected with a plasmid expressing Hspa4 . Twenty-four hours post-transfection, the cells were harvested for analysis of Fe 2+ . n = 3 biologically independent samples. EV: empty vector; TF: transferrin. All data are presented as means ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by unpaired Student’s t -test.

    Article Snippet: Transferrin in the cell culture medium was measured with a commercial ELISA kit (EK1201; MultiScience).

    Techniques: Expressing, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation, Fluorescence, Cell Culture, Western Blot, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay